Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js

Tensor categories

Victor Ostrik
University of Oregon

Abstract: This series of talks will be devoted to the theory of tensor categories which is a mathematical side of quantum symmetries. We will discuss basic definitions, examples and constructions of such categories, as well as some structure theory and classification results.


Suggested lectures as prerequisites:

1) Categories, functors, natural transformations, some idea about additive and abelian categories

2) Finite dimensional algebras over (alg closed) fields: Wedderburn-Artin theory and Jacobson radical; projective and injective modules

3) Representations of groups

4) Cohomology of groups: cocycles and coboundaries. (Seccions 1.1 and 1.2 of the document.)


Lecture notes

Notes by Harshit Yadav

Lecture 1

Lecture 2

Lecture 3

Lecture 4


Problem session

In charge of Paul Gustafson

Problems 1

  1. Make precise and prove the following statement: Functors and multi-functors between semisimple categories are determined (up to natural isomorphism of functors) by their values.
  2. Let (C,,a) be a category with a tensor product and an associativity constraint satisfying a pentagon axiom. Let SC be an object such SSS and the functors XXS and XSX are fully faithful. Prove that S is the unit object of C. (cf Lemma 4.2.6 of [KS]).

  3. Let C be a monoidal category and XC. Prove that the (right) dual objects of X are all canonically isomorphic. (see Proposition 2.10.5 in [EGNO]).

  4. Let C be a monoidal category.

    (a) Define “most obvious” monoidal structure on the category C×C. Show that C is braided if and only if the tensor product functor C×CC is a tensor functor (this means that braidings are in bijection with the structures of tensor functor).

    (b) Assume C is braided. Define most obvious’’ braided structure on the category C×C. Show that C is symmetric if and only if the tensor product functor C×CC is braided.

  5. Prove that the two hexagon axioms in the definition of a braided monoidal category are independent, that is none of them imply the other one. Hint: think about pointed categories with trivial associator.

  6. Let X,YC be two objects such that XYYX1. Prove that X is invertible. (see Ex 4.12 from [KS]).

  7. Give a description of pointed categories in terms of normalized cocycles (see e.g. Exercise 2.3.9 in [EGNO]).

  8. Give a complete classification of pointed fusion categories with the underlying group C2. Include the description in the case of tensor, braided tensor, and symmetric categories. What are possible pivotal/spherical structures? (see Problem 4.5 (v) from [KS]).

  9. Replace the group C2 by C3 in the previous exercise.

  10. (See Problem 4.13 from [KS]) Let XC and assume that there is nZ>0 and an isomorphism λ:Xn1. Then we have two isomorphisms X(n+1)X, namely λid and idλ.

    (a) These two isomorphisms are not necessarily the same.

    (b) These two isomorphisms are or are not the same independently of the choice of λ.

    (c) If the isomorphisms are the same the object X generates a subcategory of C equivalent to VecCn.

    (d) The ratio of the two isomorphisms is always a root of 1 of degree n.

  11. Show that there exists a surjective tensor functor from VecC4 to VecωC2 where ω is nontrivial.

  12. Compute explicitly the associativity constraint for the Fibonacci category.

  13. Describe braided pointed fusion categories in terms of abelian cocycles (see Exercises 8.4.3-8.4.6 in [EGNO]).

  14. Compute the action of Aut(Cn) on H3(Cn,k×). (See Example 2.6.4 in [EGNO]).

  15. Let a(n)= number of pointed fusion categories such that the isomorphism classes of simple objects form a cyclic group of order n up to tensor equivalence. Compute a(n) as much as possible.

Bibliography

[KS] = M.Kashiwara, P.Schapira “Categories and sheaves”.

[EGNO] = P.Etingof, S.Gelaki, D.Nikshych, V.Ostrik “Tensor categories”.

Tensor categories - César Galindo